<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Jeffrey Goldberg</title>
      <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:25:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>What a Putz</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Ruth Marcus has a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR2009063003046.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">great column</a> today on the unforgivable Mark Sanford (though, man, would I like an interview with that guy, because pure-bred, hi-test, four-square narcissists always make for the best interviews). Ruth argues cogently that it is not Jenny Sanford who has been humiliated here:<br /><blockquote>I admire, too, her practical vision of real love and what it takes to make a marriage work. "It wasn't exactly love at first sight," Sanford recalled about meeting her future husband at a beach party in the Hamptons. "It was more like friendship at first sight."<br /><br />Now she still has her feet on the ground even as her husband is head over heels -- with another woman. "I believe enduring love is primarily a commitment and an act of will, and for a marriage to be successful, that commitment must be reciprocal," Jenny Sanford said in her statement.<br /><br />And I admire her investment-banker steel. "He was told in no uncertain terms not to see her," she said in an interview with the Associated Press last week about her husband's pleas for permission to visit his mistress. And, on his decision to defy her: "You would think that a father who didn't have contact with his children, if he wanted those children, he would toe the line a little bit."<br /></blockquote> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/07/what_a_putz.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/07/what_a_putz.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed,01 Jul 2009 17:25:55 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Those Damn Colorado Ski Resort Jewish Burglars </title>
         <description><![CDATA[Thank goodness we here in Aspen don't have problems with large-nosed burglars <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/32185/vail-area-sheriffs-office-steps-in-it-again-with-jewish-descent-release">like they do in Vail</a>:<br /><blockquote>The Vail Daily newspaper last week took the brunt of a well-deserved public beat-down for publishing a sheriff's department press release in which a witness to a home break-in in Edwards described a suspect as being of "Jewish or Eastern European descent."<br /></blockquote> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/those_damn_colorado_ski_resort.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/those_damn_colorado_ski_resort.php</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Ideas 2009</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,29 Jun 2009 13:28:52 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is Roger Cohen a Neocon?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Sure <a href="http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/answering-your-iran-questions/">sounds like it</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>I think President Obama, as I wrote from Tehran, erred on the side of caution early on. He misspoke in equating Moussavi with Ahmadinejad in terms of US strategic interests. He should have been more forthright in standing with the Green Wave. Meddling be damned. This was a pivotal and historic moment. Obama should have tossed the strategy papers in the garbage and spoken from the heart.<br /><br />His comments got stronger and better, but they came as the street protests ebbed.</blockquote> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/is_roger_cohen_a_neocon.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/is_roger_cohen_a_neocon.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,29 Jun 2009 03:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>That Washington Post Crash Piece: A Dissent</title>
         <description><![CDATA[John Judis <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2009/06/28/who-killed-the-washington-post.aspx">didn't think much</a> of that piece by Eli Saslow <a href="http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/lets_see_the_huffington_post_t.php">I linked to before</a>, on the survivors of the Red Line crash. He argues that the Washington Post has ignored systemic problems with Metro, and has instead provided its readers with "fluff":<br /><blockquote>And now in the wake of the Metro crash, how is the newspaper responding?&nbsp;&nbsp; With a front page fluff piece on three people who survived the crash.&nbsp; Maybe it's a wonderful piece, a real tear-jerker by an author with the skills of a Tony Lukas or Joan Didion.&nbsp; I don't know, because I am not wasting my time reading it. I am still waiting for the newspaper to do what local newspapers should do, and get to the bottom of what happened, and do it in a way that will prevent future crashes.<br /></blockquote>I'm not in a position to argue that the Washington Post has adequately covered problems in the Metro system; Judis makes a strong case that it hasn't.&nbsp; I don't think, however, that the piece today was "fluff," and I think Judis would see that if he had actually read it before he condemned it. And by the way, bringing the human tragedy of the crash to light can only help spark the outrage necessary to reform the system. ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/that_washington_post_crash_pie.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/that_washington_post_crash_pie.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,29 Jun 2009 03:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Let&apos;s See the Huffington Post Try to Do This </title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Washington Post today <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/27/AR2009062702417.html?hpid=topnews">features a beautifully-written article</a> by Eli Saslow about the people who survived the Red Line crash on the Washington Metro earlier this week. The story is deeply-reported, authoritative, riveting and altogether a reproach to those who say that newspapers are somehow unnecessary, that the Huffington sweatshop and Google and the Daily Beast will keep us sufficiently informed. Read the whole thing and tell me I'm wrong. &nbsp; ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/lets_see_the_huffington_post_t.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/lets_see_the_huffington_post_t.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun,28 Jun 2009 17:36:37 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Peace is at Hand: Khaled Meshal Clears Everything Up</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Here's what the Hamas leader <a href="http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2009/06/26/77050.html">said</a> in a recent interview:<br /><br /><blockquote>"The enemy's leaders call for a so-called Jewish state is a racist demand that is no different from calls by Italian Fascists and Hitler's Nazism." <br /></blockquote>Yep, Hamas is definitely moderating. Just like the mullahs.<br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/peace_is_at_hand_khaled_meshal.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/peace_is_at_hand_khaled_meshal.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun,28 Jun 2009 04:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Appalachian Trail</title>
         <description>I&apos;m not hiking it (literally or euphemistically) but I&apos;m heading out today for Colorado, which is like the Appalachian Trail but with less air. A bunch of us from The Atlantic will be there in the coming days for the Aspen Ideas Festival. Blogging will be light for the next little while because I&apos;ll be busy testing my ideas on the elk. </description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/the_appalachian_trail.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/the_appalachian_trail.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu,25 Jun 2009 11:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Well, Gov. Sanford Isn&apos;t Suffering from Dissociative Fugue</title>
         <description><![CDATA[He's suffering from something else entirely: Argentine Nookie Syndrome. We're watching this ridiculous man on TV now. James Bennet: "So he didn't want the stimulus money but he did want a certain kind of stimulus." <br /><br /><br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/well_gov_sanford_isnt_sufferin.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/well_gov_sanford_isnt_sufferin.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed,24 Jun 2009 18:36:25 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Does Gov. Sanford Suffer from Dissociative Fugue?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Gov. Sanford's strange vanishing act -- he was thought to be hiking the Appalachian Trail alone, until he washed up in Argentina -- prompts me to wonder if he suffers from a condition known as dissociative fugue disorder. When a person is in this fugue state, he'll pick up and travel suddenly to some random point, not at all sure why he's doing it, and sometimes with little memory of who he is. For a fuller description of this unusual condition, <a href="http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec07/ch106/ch106d.html">read this</a>. Here's one interesting observation from the Merck Manual:<br /><blockquote>Dissociative fugue is often mistaken for malingering because both
conditions may give people an excuse to avoid their responsibilities
(as in an intolerable marriage), to avoid accountability for their
actions, or to reduce their exposure to a known hazard, such as a
battle. However, dissociative fugue, unlike malingering, occurs
spontaneously and is not faked.</blockquote> If I were on Sanford's spin patrol, I'd certainly look into this.<br />]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/does_gov_sanford_suffer_from_d.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/does_gov_sanford_suffer_from_d.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed,24 Jun 2009 15:39:10 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>How Long is the Appalachian Trail?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[It would be a long walk from <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/06/24/1975551.aspx">South Carolina</a>, but maybe the trail reaches into Argentina. Just a thought. Must ask <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Walk-Woods-Rediscovering-Appalachian-Official/dp/0767902521">Bill Bryson</a>. ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/how_long_is_the_appalachian_tr.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/how_long_is_the_appalachian_tr.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed,24 Jun 2009 13:47:34 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>What Roger Cohen Saw </title>
         <description><![CDATA[Andrew <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/06/roger-cohen-in-iran.html">writes</a> of Roger Cohen: <br /><blockquote>He too saw this coming, and was vilified by the usual suspects for reaching for peace. If you want to read classic old media journalism by a reporter with passion and courage, his missive tonight is as good as it gets. Cohen proves the old media is not dead. May it rise again.<br /></blockquote>On behalf of the "usual suspects," let me just say this: Roger Cohen in no way "saw this coming." In fact, he made a name for himself internationally as one of the leading Western apologists for Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, arguing that the regime was substantially benign and that engagement with these murderers was practically a moral necessity. He saw nothing coming, nothing at all. He has even admitted as much. To his credit, last week <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/opinion/15iht-edcohen.html">he wrote</a>: "I erred in underestimating the brutality and cynicism of a regime that understands the uses of ruthlessness."<br />]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/what_roger_cohen_saw.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/what_roger_cohen_saw.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,22 Jun 2009 20:41:39 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>When Iranian Demonstrators and Bibi Netanyahu Agree </title>
         <description><![CDATA[Strange days. This is from <a href="http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/22/iranian-protestor-plea/">CNN</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote><p><strong>Mohammad:</strong> Excuse me, sir. I have a message for the international community. Would you please let me tell it?</p><p><strong>Roberts:</strong> Yes, go ahead.</p><p><strong>Mohammad:</strong> Americans, European Union, international
community, this government is not definitely -- is definitely not
elected by the majority of Iranians. So it's illegal. Do not recognize
it. Stop trading with them. Impose much more sanctions against them. My
message...to the international community, especially I'm addressing
President Obama directly - how can a government that doesn't recognize
its people's rights and represses them brutally and mercilessly have
nuclear activities? This government is a huge threat to global peace.
Will a wise man give a sharp dagger to an insane person? We need your
help international community. Don't leave us alone.</p><p><strong>Chetry:</strong> Mohammad, what do you think the international community should do besides sanctions?</p><p><strong>Mohammad:</strong> Actually, this regime is really dependent
on importing gasoline. More than 85% of Iran's gasoline is imported
from foreign countries. I think international communities must sanction
exporting gasoline to Iran and that might shut down the government.</p></blockquote>



<br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/when_iranian_demonstrators_and.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/when_iranian_demonstrators_and.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,22 Jun 2009 20:24:56 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Who Talks This Way?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/world/middleeast/23iran.html?hp">Times</a> today:<br /><blockquote>At a news conference Monday, Hassan Qashqavi, a Foreign Ministry spokesman, called the turnout a "brilliant gem which is shining on the peak of dignity of the Iranian nation."<br /><br /></blockquote> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/who_talks_this_way.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/who_talks_this_way.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,22 Jun 2009 16:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>What if Khamenei and Ahmadinejad Win?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A terrible thought, but what if the Iranian regime actually suppresses the revolt of the Iranian masses? <br /><br />I don't think this is possible, in the long run, of course: A regime that slaughters its own children has no future. But it can presumably maintain its grip on power for at least a while. What does this mean for its looming confrontation with America and, in particular, Israel, over its nuclear program? Do the events of recent days prove Benjamin Netanyahu right? <br /><br />Yesterday, on <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/31472770#31472770">Meet the Press</a>, Netanyahu told David Gregory that recent events have "unmasked" the true nature of the regime, and this is undoubtedly true: No one, not even the regime's apologists, believes that these men are secret moderates interested in seeing Iran rejoin the civilized world. So in one way, the regime's murderous response to dissent helps Netanyahu make his case that this is indeed a fanatic regime. But recent events also cut against Netanyahu's analysis, I think: The Iranian regime has exposed itself as interested mainly in self-preservation. Netanyahu told me earlier this spring that Iran is run by a "messianic, apocalyptic cult." But I think there's an argument to be made that Khamenei and Ahmadinejad are grubby men mainly interested in perpetuating their power. In other words, they seem to behave like rather quotidian dictators, not religious fanatics. A confrontation with Israel would certainly threaten the stability of their regime, and the stability of their regime is something they quite obviously cherish. ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/what_if_khamenei_and_ahmadinej.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/what_if_khamenei_and_ahmadinej.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,22 Jun 2009 13:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Trader Joe&apos;s Update (Plus: What is Israeli Couscous?)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Goldblog reader Guy Handelman writes:<br /><br /><blockquote>I just came back from Trader Joes.&nbsp; The manager told me that they only carry 2 Israeli products (couscous and feta cheese).&nbsp; They already sold out of feta cheese, so I bought a box of couscous.&nbsp; It looks like the anti-Israel folks picked the wrong store to boycott.<br /></blockquote>And this, from the <a href="http://www.jewishjournal.com/community/article/anti-israel_group_boycotts_trader_joes_2_20090620/">Los Angeles Jewish Journal:</a><br /><br /><blockquote>In Los Angeles... the only unusual activity reported was that of local patrons walking into the national food chain to ask to buy Israeli products in specific.<br /><br /></blockquote>Since Trader Joe's only stocks two Israeli products, you'd think that the International Campaign to Scapegoat Israel would have picked a better target. <br /><br />One other question has been raised in all this: Just what is Israeli couscous? As a friend once asked, isn't Israeli couscous Israeli the way that French toast is French? I'm not sure of the answer -- I suppose there could be an Israeli variant, developed in Israel's large community of Moroccan Jews -- but this question reminds me of the <a href="http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/ive_seen_the_apocalypse_and_it.php">great hummus debate</a>, as well as the periodic eruption of falafel fighting, described here in this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/10/dining/a-history-of-the-mideast-in-the-humble-chickpea.html?scp=1&amp;sq=kantor%20falafel&amp;st=cse">Times article</a> by Jodi Kantor:<br /><blockquote>It's nice to think that sharing a cherished food brings enemies
together, easing tension and misunderstanding. But the world's rawest
conflicts can include disagreements over common foodstuffs. Irish
Catholics and Protestants have lightly bickered over whiskey. Turks and
Greeks have feuded over coffee. And Jews and Arabs argue about falafel
in a way that reflects the wider conflict, touching on debates over
territory and history. ''Food always migrates according to immigration
and commerce,'' said Yael Raviv, an Israeli student at New York
University who wrote her Ph.D. thesis on Israeli nationalism and
cuisine. ''But because of the political situation, falafel has taken on
enormous significance.''<br /></blockquote> ]]></description>
         <link>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/trader_joes_update_plus_what_i.php</link>
         <guid>http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/trader_joes_update_plus_what_i.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon,22 Jun 2009 13:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
